Readers Chime in on Pay-to-Play Conversation

2016 is shaping up to be the year that tied-house topics boiled over. Last week we covered a panel discussion on the issue of pay-to-play practices, which included a call for reader responses [see WSD 03-09-2016]. Quite a few of our readers piped in with commentary, but requested to remain anonymous. Here's what they had to say:

You are unauthorized to view this page.